home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
- Reported by Karen Roubicek/BBN
-
- AGENDA
-
-
- 1. Review Charter, Objectives, Goals.
- 2. Review current version of bibliography, assign remaining tasks.
- 3. Discuss remaining issues (appropriateness of categories, keywords,
- RFC format)
- 4. Determine publication schedule.
- 5. Discuss maintenance of bibliography, update procedures
- 6. Discuss distribution.
- 7. Determine action items for next meeting, future projects.
-
-
- MINUTES
-
- The meeting began with a review of the charter of the USER-DOC Working
- Group, and a check to see if the group was meeting its goals. A draft
- of the bibliography was successfully generated in December, thanks
- particularly to the efforts of the "Editorial Board". The Board met
- twice since the last IETF using the videoteleconferencing facilities at
- SRI, ISI, DARPA and BBN.
-
- The current draft of the bibliography is significantly more complete
- than the previous version. The group went through the individual
- entries and made comments. There is still a small amount of additional
- research as well as some additions and corrections that are required
- before the bibliography is complete. These specific assignments will be
- done by members of the Editorial Board. The question of multiple
- repositories for RFCs was discussed. Although there are collections of
- RFCs available on several hosts in the Internet, the group decided that
- in the interest of centralizing access and ensuring that readers would
- be able to find all the RFCs mentioned in the "basic beige" list, only
- the main collection at SRI would be listed in the RFC section (Section
- 12). However, the Introduction to the bibliography will be revised to
- state that RFCs are available elsewhere (e.g., Merit, CSNET)
-
- In discussing which items should be included or excluded from certain
- sections, the group decided that some form of disclaimer should be put
- into the Introduction. The concern is that an organization or author
- might complain if their entry were not included and the group wanted to
- state up front that the bibliography is not all-inclusive but rather a
- sampling of what resources are available. Karen Armstrong will write
- the disclaimer. On a similar topic, Jack Hahn expressed concern that
- even though the bibliography covers selected "basic materials", there is
- still a need for a short list, of perhaps 4 or 5 entries, for those
- users who don't have the time to go through the entire bibliography.
- Jack Hahn will provide Karen Bowers with a suggested list and she will
- change the Introduction accordingly.
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
- All the attendees concurred on the value and need for an online,
- searchable version of the bibliography. However, the more pressing need
- is to make the document available as soon as possible, so the group
- agreed that a refer and formatted version will be available first, while
- a small group (Lee Oattes and Mary Stahl) will pursue the options for an
- online searchable form.
-
- The current draft of the bibliography contains keywords, but there were
- strong feelings that those keywords are not effective and should not be
- included in this hardcopy version. Mary Stahl and Berlin Moore, as
- members of the Keyword Committee, will spend some time looking for the
- correct set of keywords.
-
- For the correct formatting of the bibliography for submission as an RFC
- in the FYI series, Joyce Reynolds referred the Editorial Committee to
- RFC 1111, Request for Comments on Request for Comments.
-
- Some organizational issues were raised, including the need to break up
- the Introduction for clarity's sake. Chapter 10, Online Files, was
- viewed as misleading, because several of the other documents listed
- throughout the bibliography are available online. This chapter was
- intended to refer to documents that were exclusively online. As an
- alternative, the items listed in Chapter 10 will be merged into the
- other chapters according to category and a separate appendix will list
- all online documents.
-
- The publication schedule is as follows:
-
- o March 7 - research/writing assignments due
- o March 21 - Formatted version of bibliography to be put into
- Internet Drafts Directory
- o March-May IETF - Comment period
- o May IETF - Submission as formal FYI RFC
-
- Mary Stahl, Tracy LaQuey and Karen Roubicek will be responsible for
- maintaining the bibliography. As was decided at the last IETF meeting,
- the bibliography will be updated annually.
-
- In addition to the bibliography's availability online in the RFC
- repositories (at the NIC and in the shadow directories elsewhere on the
- Internet), the group brought up the option of additional hardcopy
- distribution. Mary Stahl will pursue the possibility of SRI providing
- and distributing paper copies and will let the group know what price the
- NIC would charge.
-
- Final points in the discussion led into topics to be taken up in the
- User Services Working Group, including an RFC about distribution
- procedures for documents and information, standards for document
- formatting and retrieval, and the need for other networking documents
- (e.g. comprehensive glossary of networking terms) in the future.
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ATTENDEES
-
- Armstrong, Karen armstrong@sds.sdsc.edu
- Bowers, Karen L. kbowers@nri.reston.va.us
- Enger, Robert M. enger@sccgate.scc.com
- Hahn, Jack hahn@umd5.umd.edu
- Jacobsen, Ole ole@csli.stanford.edu
- Moore, Berlin prepnet@andrew.cmu.edu
- Oattes, Lee oattes@utcs.utoronto.ca
- Reynolds, Joyce K. jkrey@venera.isi.edu
- Roubicek, Karen roubicek@nnsc.nsf.net
- Smith, Pat psmith@merit.edu
- Stahl, Mary stahl@nisc.sri.com
- Sturtevant, Allen sturtevant@ccc.nmfecc.gov
- Wobus, John jmwobus@suvm.acs.syr.edu
- Yuan, Aileen aileen@gateway.mitre.org
-
-
-
- 3
-